ADRV Notification

NOW WHAT?

Athletes who receive an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) notification from USADA should know that they are not alone and that there are many resources available to help them navigate this process.

Below is information about contacting the Team USA Athlete Ombuds and accessing mental health resources from the USOPC, along with information outlining the results management process, how to apply for a Therapeutic Use Exemption, and answers to commonly asked ADRV questions.

Team USA Athletes Ombuds

A safe place to seek confidential, independent, impartial advice and assistance on sport-related matters.

The Team USA Athlete Ombuds serves as a safe, independent, and confidential place for Team USA athletes to seek advice about:

  • any sport-related rule, policy, or process;
  • how to navigate raising or responding to concerns;
  • how to access to legal and mental health resources.

Team USA athletes navigating anti-doping rules, policies or processes may reach out to the Athlete Ombuds (ombudsman@usathlete.org). All other athletes (e.g., junior, masters, recreational, non-Olympic or Paralympic disciplines) may wish to visit usathlete.org to learn about anti-doping, legal, and mental health resources.

Contact the Athlete Ombuds

TEAM USA
Athlete Mental Health Resource Guide

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee offers a variety of resources for athlete mental health and support. Click the image or the button below to view the full resource guide that includes details on insurance, help lines, and mental wellness applications.

If you need urgent support, please call the Team USA Mental Health Support line at (719) 866-CALL (2255).

Frequently Asked Questions

Got Questions?

Click on the question to drop down the answer.

How is an athlete informed of an Adverse Analytical Finding or other potential anti-doping rule violation?

After receiving notification from the laboratory of an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF), or if USADA has decided to move forward with a non-analytical case (proof of a violation based upon evidence other than an AAF), USADA will notify the athlete, the USOPC, the relevant IF, WADA, and the athlete’s NGB. When the athlete’s ”A”’ sample has returned a positive result, the athlete will have the opportunity to request that their “B” sample be tested and be present at the laboratory for the ”B” sample opening.

The “B” sample opening and analysis typically occurs within 10 working days after the athlete’s request that their “B” sample be analyzed.

This is considered a positive test and USADA will charge the athlete with an anti-doping rule violation.

Yes. The athlete has the right to contest the sanction sought by USADA by electing to proceed to a hearing before the independent arbitral body designated to resolve alleged rule violations.

The standard commercial arbitration rules of the independent arbitral body, as modified by USADA’s Procedures for the Arbitration of Olympic & Paralympic Sport Disputes, apply to the hearing process.

The hearing will be completed within two months of the appointment of the arbitrator, except in cases involving extraordinary circumstances, upon good cause shown by a party, in cases of sufficient complexity where completion within two months is not reasonable, or if the parties mutually agree on a different schedule.

Under the USADA adjudication process, sanctions for anti-doping rule violations must be consistent with the World Anti-Doping Code, the relevant IF rules, or the USOPC National Anti-Doping Policies.

USADA pays all administrative costs relating to the testing and results management of the athlete’s sample. The athlete pays for all of their defense, including travel, legal fees, and expert witness costs. The parties’ responsibility for the costs of the arbitration process are set forth in Rules 25(c) and 45-48 of USADA’s Procedures for the Arbitration of Anti-Doping Rule Violations.

The IF receives notice of all steps in the process after a decision to move forward with a case has been made. The IF is invited to appear as a party or observer at the arbitration hearing and has the right to appeal the decision under the World Anti-Doping Code.

In many cases, if a test conducted by an IF on a U.S. athlete results in an Adverse Analytical Finding, the IF will forward the case to USADA to handle the results management process and adjudication.

Additional Resources

Clean Sport Handbook

Clean Sport Handbook

The Clean Sport Handbook is designed to provide athletes and athlete support personnel with a summary of the information needed to successfully participate in the anti-doping program governing their sport.

Back to Top